Lord Triesman: The Government are in frequent and regular contact with the Government of Saudi Arabia as part of the normal conduct of our close bilateral relationship across a wide range of issues of mutual concern.
	In view of the ongoing nature of the Serious Fraud Office investigations it would not be appropriate to comment further.

Lord Davies of Oldham: The table below gives the percentage of trips to and from school by children aged five to 10 years and 11 to 16 years in England for which the main mode was walking or cycling. Figures are taken from the National Travel Survey in 2005 and 1995-97, the earliest year for which comparable data are available.
	
		
			 Percentage of trips to and from school by main mode, 1995-97—2005, England 
			  1995-97 2005 
			 Main mode 5-10 years 11-16 years 5-10 years 11-16 years 
			 Walk 53 41 50 43 
			 Bicycle - 2 1 2

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: The Question appears to relate to Home Office data collected from police forces and the courts. The most recently available figures were published in table 2.06 of Violent Crime Overview, Homicide and Gun Crime 2004/05 (HOSB 02/06). As of 28 November 2005, there were 953 offences currently recorded as homicide in England and Wales during the financial year 2002-03.
	In 42 of these cases the apparent circumstance of the offence was classed as being an
	"irrational act carried out by an apparently insane or disturbed subject",
	included in the above publication as "suspect mentally disturbed". However, as only one circumstance can be recorded per case, these figures do not include all those homicides committed by a suspect with mental health problems.
	The Home Office also publishes annual data about persons managed under Mental Health Act powers, including those convicted of homicide. Latest published figures are in Statistics of Mentally Disordered Offenders 2004 (HOSB 22/05). In 2004 there were 99 homicide convictions resulting in suspects being detained under Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983. These figures cannot, however, be broken down to show the method of killing.
	
		
			 Offences currently recorded as homicide1 by apparent circumstances2 and method of killing, England and Wales, 2002-03 
			  Circumstance 
			 Method Total Suspect mentally disturbed3 Other circumstances 
			 Sharp instrument 266 14 252 
			 Blunt instrument 47 4 43 
			 Hitting, kicking, etc 147 7 140 
			 Strangulation4 64 5 59 
			 Shooting5 75 0 75 
			 Explosion 4 2 2 
			 Burning 22 5 17 
			 Drowning 6 0 6 
			 Poison or drugs6 201 1 200 
			 Motor vehicle7 21 0 21 
			 Other 51 4 47 
			 Not known 49 0 49 
			 Total 953 42 911 
			 1 As at 28 November 2005; figures are subject to revision as cases are dealt with by the police and by the courts or as further information becomes available. 
			 2 In a very small number of cases the circumstances of a homicide could be classified into more than one category and an assessment been made of the principal circumstances. 
			 3 Offences included here relate to circumstances considered to be "irrational act carried out by apparently insane or disturbed suspect". 
			 4 Includes asphyxiation. 
			 5 Includes shooting by crossbow. 
			 6 Includes 172 victims of Dr Harold Shipman. 
			 7 Excludes death by careless/dangerous driving and aggravated vehicle taking.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: The question appears to relate to Home Office data collected from police forces and the courts and the most recently available figures were published in table 2.06 of Violent Crime Overview, Homicide and Gun Crime 2004/05 (HOSB 02/06). As of 28 November 2005, there were 953 offences currently recorded as homicide in England and Wales during the financial year 2002-03.
	In 42 of these cases the apparent circumstance of the offence was classed as being an "irrational act carried out by an apparently insane or disturbed subject". The victim and principal suspect were acquainted in 29 of these cases (69 per cent). It is important to note that data on the homicide index include only one circumstance per case and so these figures do not include all those homicides where a suspect has mental health problems. Other circumstances were recorded in the remaining 911 cases, including 399 where the victim and principal suspect were acquainted (44 per cent).
	The Home Office also publishes annual data about persons managed under Mental Health Act powers, including those convicted of homicide. Latest published figures are in Statistics of Mentally Disordered Offenders 2004 (HOSB 22/05). In 2004 there were 99 homicide convictions resulting in suspects being detained under Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983.

Baroness Byford: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Further to the Written Answers by the Parliamentary Secretary for Biodiversity, Landscape and Rural Affairs, Mr Barry Gardiner, on 6 November (HC Deb, 705W) and the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Care Services, Mr Ivan Lewis, on 8 November (HC Deb, 1877W), on what basis bonuses are awarded to staff in the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; why the average award has risen from £350 in November 2004 to £1,746 in November; how often the formulae used have resulted in bonuses over £9,999; and why the department has a highest award of £34,000 compared with maxima in the Department of Health of £22,500 in 2004—05 and £30,000 in 2005—06.

Lord Davies of Oldham: Whilst local authorities are able to introduce discretionary disabled parking bays, it is not possible to regulate or enforce the use of discretionary bays.
	Local authorities have the power under the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984 to make traffic regulation orders to introduce designated disabled parking bays that can be enforced by the police service or local authority parking attendants, depending on who is responsible for parking enforcement in the area.

Baroness Ashton of Upholland: The Government have recently become aware of growing concern among electoral administrators about whether polling station officials would have the right to withhold a ballot paper from an elector who refused to provide a signature.
	After careful consideration of the relevant provision in the Electoral Administration Act 2006, the Government agree that the lack of a clear sanction for a polling station official to withhold a ballot paper in these circumstances may give rise to confusion, inconsistency of practice, and potential legal challenge. Accordingly, the Government have decided not to commence signing at a polling station until such a sanction can be brought forward. As such a sanction will require primary legislation, it will not be practicable to commence signing at a polling station for elections scheduled for May 2007.
	The Electoral Commission, which has a key rolein providing returning officers and electoral administrators with advice and guidance and electoral administrators, has been formally advised that legislation for signing at a polling station will not be commenced for 3 May 2007 and, therefore, no request of signatures from electors in polling stations should be made until further notice.

Baroness Byford: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Further to the Written Answer by the Minister of State for Local Environment, Marine and Animal Welfare, Mr Ben Bradshaw, on 6 November(HC Deb, 715W), why it is not currently possible to obtain reliable information from the European Union-wide system for export certification; when the system will be fully operational; and whether, when it is fully operational, it will be possible to make retrospective enquiries; and
	Further to the Written Answer by the Minister of State for Local Environment, Marine and Animal Welfare, Mr Ben Bradshaw, on 6 November (HC Deb, 715W), whether the failure of the European Union-wide system for export certification predates the Written Answer by the Minister on 7 November 2005 (HC Deb, 13W); and, if so, whether the figures quoted in that answer showing that over 90 per cent of the captive birds imported into Europe come to the United Kingdom is correct.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: Further to the update sent to the noble Lord on 23 October, good progress with the roll-out programme is being maintained. A total of24 forces have been migrated to the system which now contains records relating to 500,000 people.
	It is still the aim to complete the roll-out process by March 2007. We will send a further update on the position at the end of January.

Baroness Wilkins: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	Further to the statement by Lord Warner on25 July (HL Deb, col 1642) regarding procurement of an additional 300,000 audiology service pathways from the independent sector, whether this initiative will result in additional capacity; and whether service commissioners could opt to use this scheme to transfer existing resources from the National Health Service to the independent sector.

Lord Warner: The procurement of extra audiology capacity by the National Health Service will be a key part of the action plan to deal with unacceptably long waits for adult hearing services in the context of the 18-week target. This follows concerns expressed over many months by representatives of patient groups and professional bodies about shortages in NHScommissioned capacity.
	The action plan will be informed by the views of a broad range of stakeholders including professional bodies and representatives of patient groups, and will I hope command broad support. A working group has been established to develop proposals, although for reasons of size has not been designed to be representative of the various groups. A forum will be held before publication to ensure that stakeholder groups and others have an opportunity to consider possible proposals and contribute their views. In the mean time, we have already had submissions from a number of professional organisations, and others are welcome to write with theirs. Whether or not there is formal consultation on the action plan or elements of it will depend on the nature of the measures.

Lord Warner: It is for primary care trusts (PCTs) and strategic health authorities (SHAs) to analyse their local workforce needs and develop plans, in liaison with the providers, to deliver high quality services, including those for epilepsy, and take action to secure the appropriate staff and skills to deliver these services.
	The chief executive of the NHS, David Nicholson, wrote to all chief executives of SHAs, NHS trusts and PCTs on 30 October 2006, encouraging NHS organisations to work together to manage workforce change and minimise the need for redundancies.Mr Nicholson's letter launched a new framework from NHS Employers, Securing and Retaining Staff for Health and Social Care—A partnership approach, which outlines good practice and promotes local partnership working for the benefit of displaced staff. A copy of the framework is available in the Library.

Lord Warner: The National Health Service data dictionary does not give a definition for a bay. Its smallest unit is a ward. However, there have been several statements that move towards a working description. The firstof these was in 1997, when the Department ofHealth issued guidance on eliminating mixed-sex accommodation. This stated:
	"at a point where a ward has been divided into separate areas to segregate the sexes, there should be screening which is adequate to ensure privacy is maintained, eg which will prevent patients being overheard and overseen by others where this is not desirable".
	In 2002, NHS Estates issued Enhancing Privacy and Dignity—Achieving Single Sex Accommodation. This offered a number of design solutions using various arrangements of bays, single rooms and open areas, and demonstrated the wide range of acceptable solutions.
	Also in 2002, in response to a Parliamentary Question, the following advice was given on how wards could be separated into bays:
	"Partitioning can be used to divide wards into bays as a means of achieving an acceptable method of protecting patients' privacy and dignity. To ensure that they provide adequate physical separation, sound reduction and visual privacy the partition must be permanent, rigid and fixed to the building structure. A mobile privacy screen alone is not an acceptable solution to enhancing privacy and dignity for the patient".

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: Legal visits are available to all detainees located at Harmondsworth on seven days a week between the hours of 09.00 and 21.00 and take place in a dedicated legal visits area. Social visits are available from 14.00 until 21.00, again seven days a week in a purpose-built social visits area. Both of those facilities were unaffected by the recent disturbance.
	Harmondsworth provides nursing facilities24 hours a day as well as a surgery by a GP seven days a week and an on-call doctor.

Lord Drayson: Sales from the Banja Luka metal factory between May 2001 and March 2006 are listed as follows:
	
		
			 Description Quantity Date 
			 Renault Traffic Puma 16 May 2001 
			 Lada Niva 1 May 2001 
			 Nissan Terrano 1 June 2001 
			 Mitsubishi Pajero 1 June 2001 
			 Minibus 2 June 2001 
			 Lighting Tower 2 February 2002 
			 Toyota Land Cruiser 1 February 2002 
			 Nissan Terrano 1 February 2002 
			 ISO Container 20 Ft 71 August 2003 
			 20 Ft Field Accommodation Units (FAU) 1 August 2003 
			 Fuel Tank—20,000 Ltrs 1 August 2003 
			 Cromax Water Tank "Silver Bullets" 1 August 2003 
			 Kitchen Unit—500 Man Camp 5 August 2003 
			 Large Container—Used As Bar 1 August 2003 
			 Equipment Inside the Reefer 1 August 2003 
			 Containerised Generating Set (Wilsons) 1 August 2003 
			 Containerised Bus-Bar System 1 August 2003 
			 Chemical Dosing System 1 August 2003 
			 Parts Of Rubb Shelter Building 35mx16mx5m 1 August 2003 
			 20' Mobile Toilet Units (Chemical) 4 August 2003 
			 20' Transportable Container Units (TCU) 5 August 2003 
			 20'TCU Converted To FAU 3 August 2003 
			 20' FAU 4 August 2003 
			 Primary Settlement Tank 3 August 2003 
			 Cromax Water Tank "Silver Bullets" 7 August 2003 
			 Acro Props (Steel Reinforcements For Ceilings) 1 August 2003 
			 Road Forms (Steel Grids) 1 August 2003 
			 Landrover Discovery—NJ55AA 1 August 2003 
			 Nissan Patrol—SN26AA 1 August 2003 
			 Trailer 3/4 Ton—21KA89 1 August 2003 
			 Econ Gritter—RS74AA 1 August 2003 
			 Econ Gritter—RS75AA 1 August 2003 
			 Roller Vibrator—10CP32 1 August 2003 
			 Landrover 90—51KG61 1 August 2003 
			 ISO Containers 58 October 2003 
			 Reefers 8 October 2003 
			 Earth Moving Equipment 4 January 2004 
			 Concrete Mixer 1 January 2004 
			 Mitsubishi Carisma 1 January 2004 
			 Sling Beam 1 January 2004 
			 Field Accommodation Units 6 May 2000 
			 Toilet Containment Units 4 May 2000 
			 Cobham Fuel Storage Tank 2 May 2000 
			 Mobile Sewage Treatment Plant 3 May 2000 
			 Fuel Storage Tank 1 May 2000 
			 Boughton Hydraulic Excavator Bucket 1 May 2000 
			 Flat Rack 1 May 2000 
			 Road Scrapers 2 May 2000 
			 Larus Shower Unit 1 May 2000 
			 Flat Rack and Mounting Frame 1 May 2000 
			 Godwin Pump 12 May 2000 
			 Battery Charging Facility 1 May 2000 
			 ISO Container 1 May 2000 
			 Fiat Minibus 1 October 2004 
			 Landrover 110 2 October 2004 
			 Trailer 3/4 Ton 1 October 2004 
			 Bedford MJ 4 Ton 1 October 2004 
			 Nissan Patrol 1 October 2004 
			 Landrover Td5 2 October 2004 
			 Nissan Terrano 1 October 2004 
			 Landrover Pick-up 1 October 2004 
			 Landrover Discovery 1 October 2004 
			 Landrover TDI 2 October 2005 
			 Minibus LDV 1 October 2005 
			 Bedford 8 Ton 1 October 2005 
			 Landrover TD5 1 October 2005 
			 Toyota Hilux 1 October 2005 
			 Container/Kitchen Equipment 1 October 2005 
			 Lockers 2 October 2005 
			 Refrigerators 5 October 2005 
		
	
	Non-warlike surplus stores are sold directlyfrom the Banja Luka metal factory site and to determine if purchasers (often individuals) are from the Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina or the Republika Srpska would incur disproportionate cost. Ministry of Defence policy is not to gift to commercial entities.

Lord Drayson: As announced in another place on 21 July 2004, (Official Report,col. 348) the trained strength of the Royal Air Force is being reduced to meet the 41,000 target by April 2008. This is being achieved through a balance of normal outflow, intake reductions and targeted redundancy. As a planned consequence of the strategy and the pace of the redundancy programme, the trained strength is falling faster than the reduction in requirement, which is resulting in a period of increased manning deficit. One significant contributing factor is that most of the 1,200 applicants selected for redundancy under tranche 2 left the service on 10 April 2006. Work is ongoing to reduce the requirement for manpower to minimise the deficit.

Lord Drayson: The tables below give the details of officers and ground trades personnel who applied and were selected under tranche 3 of the RAF redundancy scheme.
	
		
			 Officers 
			 Branch Rank Number of Applicants Number Selected 
			 General Duties Air Commodore and above 10 5 
			  Group Captain 15 5 
			  Wing Commander 50 15 
			 Engineering Squadron Leader 20 5 
			  Flight Lieutenant 10 5 
			 Supply Squadron Leader 10 5 
			  Flight Lieutenant 10 10 
			 Administration Squadron Leader 15 5 
			 Medical Support Officer Group Captain - 0 
			  Total 150 60 
		
	
	Non-commissioned Aircrew
	Nil.
	
		
			 Ground Trades 
			 Trade Rank Number of Applicants Number Selected 
			 Aircraft Engineering Technician Warrant Officer 5 5 
			  Flight Sergeant 45 25 
			 Aircraft Technician (Mechanical) Chief Technician 75 10 
			  Sergeant 35 10 
			  Corporal 240 50 
			  Junior Technician / Senior Aircraftsman 180 150 
			 General Engineering Technician Warrant Officer 5 5 
			  Flight Sergeant 10 5 
			  Chief Technician 20 10 
			 General Technician (Mechanical) Sergeant 60 40 
			  Corporal 100 60 
			  Junior Technician / Senior Aircraftsman 20 20 
			 Intelligence Analyst (Voice) Warrant Officer - - 
			  Flight Sergeant - 10 
			  Chief Technician 15 5 
			  Sergeant 20 10 
			 Painter & Finisher Flight Sergeant 5 5 
			  Sergeant 15 15 
			  Corporal 30 30 
			  Senior Aircraftsman 60 60 
			 Air Cartographer Flight Sergeant - - 
			  Sergeant 20 - 
			  Corporal 15 - 
			 Dental Technician Flight Sergeant / Chief Technician / Sergeant / Corporal 10 10 
			 Personnel Administrator Warrant Officer 30 25 
			  Flight Sergeant  40 
			  Sergeant 170 85 
			  Corporal 35 20 
			 Supplier Flight Sergeant 10 5 
			  Sergeant 25 5 
			  Corporal 40 10 
			 Catering Accountant Warrant Officer - - 
			  Flight Sergeant - 5 
			  Sergeant 5 10 
			  Corporal 5 15 
			  Senior Aircraftsman 5 15 
			  Total 1,345 760 
			 1. All figures have been rounded to the nearest five. Due to the rounding methods used totals may not always equal the sum of the parts. Numbers less than five but not zero are denoted by "-" and zero is denoted by "0".

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: The information requested, which has been supplied by the Youth Justice Board, is in the following table.
	
		
			 Date Hassockfield Medway Oakhill Rainsbrook 
			  Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 
			 October 2006 20 10 92 42 27 30 20 18 
			 September 2006 24 14 100 47 33 35 26 35 
			 August 2006 53 9 70 33 36 44 37 19 
			 July 2006 13 6 63 10 22 45 32 6 
			 June 2006 49 7 87 28 30 38 17 5 
			 May 2006 14 15 51 13 38 33 14 5 
			 April 2006 14 24 16 16 27 46 33 7 
			 March 2006 60 26 36 10 17 27 12 7 
			 February 2006 51 50 65 30 15 36 15 11 
			 January 2006 39 25 62 46 27 75 22 16 
			 December 2005 39 12 51 19 40 63 20 33 
			 November 2005 45 23 42 19 71 66 24 11

Lord Luke: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	How much money, over and above the£600 million package of financial support announced by the Chancellor of the Exchequer on Budget Day 2006, will be devoted to meet his pledge of 25 October that "every talented young sports star should have extra support to help them train and develop".

Lord Davies of Oldham: The £600 million package of financial support for high-performance sport, managed and allocated by UK Sport, is the primary route of support for talented young athletes in Olympic and Paralympic sports who have the potential to compete and win in international competition. Government and UK Sport assess that there are now sufficient levels of funding in the performance system to 2012 to ensure that genuine world class talent is not lost to summer Olympic and Paralympic sports.
	The national governing bodies (NGBs) of English non-Olympic sports receive funding from Sport England through their whole sport plans and will use a proportion of this to identify and support talented athletes. In addition, the Government's school sport strategy provides access to a range of non-Olympic sports, and talent in particular is supported through the gifted and talented scheme. Since 2003, over£6.5 million has been invested in this scheme.
	The talented athlete scholarship scheme (TASS) enables talented athletes to continue in their sport beyond the age of 16 while pursuing further or higher education. TASS 2012, a strand of the TASS programme, supports our most talented 12 to 18 year-olds in a variety of Olympic, Paralympic, non-Olympic and non-Paralympic sports. Between 2004 and 2008, the Government will have committed £ 17 million to TASS and TASS 2012.
	Lastly, government funding extends to the advanced apprenticeship in sporting excellence programme, which is a structured national training and development route across all sports for young people who have the realistic potential to achieve excellence in their sport and perform at the highest level. Up to £15 million is being invested into this two-year programme.

Lord Davies of Oldham: The national governing bodies (NGBs) of English non-Olympic sports receive funding from Sport England through their whole sport plans and will use a proportion of this to identify and support talented athletes.
	For those sports that run high-performance programmes, Sport England and UK Sport are discussing how UK Sport's expertise could add value to these programmes. UK Sport also provides funding directly to the UK non-Olympic sports of waterskiing and orienteering.
	The Government's school sport strategy provides access to a range of non-Olympic sports, and talent is supported through the gifted and talented scheme. Since 2003, over £6.5 million has been invested in this scheme. The talented athlete scholarship scheme (TASS) enables talented athletes to continue in their sport beyond the age of 16 while pursuing furtheror higher education. TASS 2012, a strand of the TASS programme, supports our most talented 12 to 18 year-olds in a variety of Olympic, Paralympic, non-Olympic and non-Paralympic sports. Between 2004 and 2008, the Government will have committed £17 million to TASS and TASS 2012.
	Government funding also extends to the advanced apprenticeship in sporting excellence programme, which is a structured national training and development route across all sports for young people who have the realistic potential to achieve excellence in their sport and perform at the highest level. Up to £15 million is being invested into this two-year programme.
	The Government do not intend to ask the Central Council of Physical Recreation for a list of talented athletes, but would encourage it to share any information it has directly with the NGBs.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: Statistics compiled from police records show that between 11 September 2001 and30 September 2006, 38 people have been convicted under the Terrorism Act 2000. A further 176 individuals were convicted under different legislation where the police investigation was conducted as a terrorist investigation.
	Data held by the Office for Criminal Justice Reform court proceedings database for the number of persons found guilty at all courts for certain terrorism offences in England and Wales from 2001 to 2005 can be found in the table attached. The information also covers the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989. Because the figures do not relate to the same period the available tables will not reflect all 38 convictions.
	
		
			 The number of persons found guilty, and sentenced at all courts for certain Terrorism offences in England and Wales 2001 to 2005 (1), (2), (3), 
			 Found guilty 
			   2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 
			 Statute Offence description  
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.21A. Knowing or suspecting or having reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting that another person has committed an offence under SS.15-18; information came in course of business in regulated sector and not disclosing as soon as practicable. - - - 1 - 
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.38B. Failure to disclose information which may be of material assistance in preventing the commission etc. of an act of terrorism. - - - 2 - 
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.13b Wears, carries or displays any article in support of a proscribed organisation - 1 - 1 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IV Sec 13A (6)(a) & 13B(5)(a). Terrorism Act 2000 SS.43, 44 and 47(1)(a)(b)(2). Failure to stop (Power to stop & search vehicles & pedestrians). - - - 1 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IV Sec 13A (6)(b) & 13B(5)(b). Terrorism Act 2000 SS.43, 44 and 47(1)(a)(b)(2). Wilful obstruction (Power to stop & search vehicles & pedestrians). - - - 1 1 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Schedule. 5 paras 3(1) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5)(a) and (18). Failure to furnish information when required by examining officer. - - 1 2 3 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 3(2)(A) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5)(b) and (18). Failing to produce either a valid passport or identifying document when required by examining officer. - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 3(2)(B) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5) (c )(d) and (18). Failing to declare or produce any relevant documents when required by examining officer. - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 4 and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch. 7(7)( 8 ) and (18). (4). Failing to submit to search by examining officer or person acting on his/her behalf. (4), - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 5(1) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch 7( 16 ) and (18). Failing to complete and produce an embarkation card when required to by examining officer. - 1 1 1 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(1)9(1)(a),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(1)(a). Failure to leave a cordoned area immediately when ordered to do so by a constable in uniform. - - - 1 1 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(2)9(1)(a),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(1)(b). Failure to leave premises, which abut or are wholly or partially within a cordoned area, immediately if ordered to do so by a constable in uniform. - - - 1 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(5)9(1)(b),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(f). Contravention or a prohibition or restriction order made by a constable in uniform to a cordoned area. Contravention or a prohibition or restriction order by a constable in uniform to a cordoned area. - - - 2 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6;9(1)(c),(4). Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.5 S.36(1)(2). Wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty in a cordoned area. Wilfully obstructing a constable in the execution of his duty in a cordoned area. - - - - 2 
			 Total  - 2 2 13 7 
		
	
	
		
			 Sentenced 
			   Conditional discharge Fine Community sentence Immediate custody Otherwise dealt with 
			 Statute Offence description  
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.21A. Knowing or suspecting or having reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting that another person has committed an offence under SS.15-18; information came in course of business in regulated sector and not disclosing as soon as practicable. - - - - 1 
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.38B. Failure to disclose information which may be of material assistance in preventing the commission etc. of an act of terrorism. - - - 2 - 
			 Terrorism Act 2000 S.13B Wears, carries or displays any article in support of a proscribed organisation - 2 - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IV Sec 13A (6)(a) & 13B(5)(a). Terrorism Act 2000 SS.43,44 and 47(1)(a)(b)(2). Failure to stop (Power to stop and search vehicles and pedestrians). - 1 - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IV Sec 13A (6)(b) & 13B(5)(b). Terrorism Act 2000 SS.43,44 and 47(1)(a)(b)(2). Wilful obstruction (Power to stop and search vehicles & pedestrians). - 1 - 1 - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 3(1) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5)(a) and (18). Failure to furnish information when required by examining officer. 1 2 1 1 1 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 3(2)(A) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5)(b) and (18). Failing to produce either a valid passport or identifying document when required by examining officer. - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 3(2)(B) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(5) (c)(d) and (18). Failing to declare or produce any relevant documents when required by examining officer. - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 4 and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.7(7)( 8 ) and (18) (4). Failing to submit to search by examining officer or person acting on his/her behalf. (4) - - - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Sch 5 paras 5(1) and 11. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch 7(16) and (18). Failing to complete and produce an embarkation card when required to by examining officer. - 3 - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(1)9(1)(a),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(1)(a). Failure to leave a cordoned area immediately when ordered to do so by a constable in uniform. 1 - - - 1 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(2)9(1)(a),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(1)(b). Failure to leave premises, which abut or are wholly or partially within a cordoned area, immediately if ordered to do so by a constable in uniform. - 1 - - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6(5)9(1)(b),4. Terrorism Act 2000 S.36(f). Contravention or a prohibition or restriction order made by a constable in uniform to a cordoned area. Contravention or a prohibition or restriction order by a constable in uniform to a cordoned area. - 1 1 - - 
			 Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 Part IVB Sec 16C Sch 6A para 6;9(1)(c),4. Terrorism Act 2000 Sch.5 S.36(1)(2). Wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty in a cordoned area. Wilfully obstructing a constable in the execution of his duty in a cordoned area. - 1 1 - - 
			 Total  2 12 3 4 3 
			 - Nil   
			 (1) These data are on the principal offence basis. 
			 (2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 
			 (3) Offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 Sections 39, 19, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 11, 15-18 and 22 are not shown because it is grouped with other offences 
			 (4) Excludes data provided by Merseyside police force area for 2004 which were incorrectly coded. 
			 Our ref: IOS 452-06. 
			 Source:  RDS Office for Criminal Justice Reform

Lord Carlile of Berriew: asked Her Majesty's Government:
	On how many occasions physical restraint was used at Warrington Young Offender Institutionon, respectively, male and female clients during each of the 12 months prior to 1 November; and
	On how many occasions physical restraint was used at Wetherby Young Offenders Institution on, respectively, male and female clients during each of the 12 months prior to 1 November.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal: The following table shows the number of times approved control and restraint techniques were used at Werrington and Wetherby Young Offender Institutions, in addition to other incidents where use of force was applied in the 12 months prior to1 November. Werrington and Wetherby hold male young offenders only.
	
		
			 Date Werrington (HL558) Wetherby (HL559) 
			 November 2005 10 20 
			 December 2005 15 10 
			 January 2006 8 28 
			 February 2006 7 22 
			 March 2006 25 21 
			 April 2006 34 23 
			 May 2006 26 32 
			 June 2006 35 29 
			 July 2006 41 29 
			 August 2006 26 33 
			 September 2006 32 32 
			 October 2006 28 28 
			 Total 287 307 
		
	
	
		
			 Use of Physical Restraint (using approved control and restraint techniques and any other incidents where use of force is applied). 
			 Date Werrington (HL558) Wetherby (HL559) 
			 November 2005 10 20 
			 December 2005 15 10 
			 January 2006 8 28 
			 February 2006 7 22 
			 March 2006 25 21 
			 April 2006 34 23 
			 May 2006 26 32 
			 June 2006 35 29 
			 July 2006 41 29 
			 August 2006 26 33 
			 September 2006 32 32 
			 October 2006 28 28 
			 Total 287 307